Senators seek more time for Thompson Divide review

By Troy Hooper
Real AspenOctober 13, 2011
Carbondale's denizens shouldn't have to lie down in front of bulldozers any time soon.

Efforts to drill for oil and gas in Thompson Divide have been met with fierce opposition from residents and leaders in Pitkin County — so much so that the executive director of the Aspen Wilderness Workshop previously told The Colorado Independent that his neighbors in Carbondale say things like, “Over my dead body,” and “Just tell me when it’s time to lie in front of the bulldozers.’”
Thompson Divide



Then last month, Pitkin County Commissioner George Newman flew to Washington, D.C., to meet with Colorado's congressional leadership and urge them to stave off drilling in the Thompson Divide area, which consists of 221,500 acres spread out over Pitkin, Gunnison, Garfield, Mesa and Delta counties. There are as many as 81 leases in the area; half of them on terrain that is currently roadless.

Most pressing is Houston-based SG Interests recent proposal to bundle federal lands where it holds leases into a specially designated unit. If the Bureau of Land Management were to approve the unit, the company's leases that are set to expire in 2013 would essentially be extended and drilling could follow on a 32,000-acre parcel of public land in Thompson Divide. The parcel, which is mostly under the surface jurisdiction of the Forest Service, is mostly located in Pitkin and Garfield counties.

U.S. Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall announced today that they have sent a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar calling for “robust and meaningful” stakeholder input before the Bureau of Land Management makes a decision on the designation.

“The commissioners of Pitkin County and other local stakeholders argue that the unitization proposal, if granted at this time, may undermine years of discussions by local governments and leaseholders to reach a long-term agreement governing mineral production and conservation of important public lands in this area. Conversely, some of the affected leaseholders argue that promptly granting the unitization request would be the most efficient way to extract the resource in an environmentally-protective manner,” the senators wrote in their letter. “After further discussions between parties, it may well be that a viable, consensus-based development plan for the area may emerge. Our intent, therefore, is not to preclude eventual consideration of such an option. However, given the lack of current local consensus, we believe it is very difficult to gauge if unitization is presently in the public interest.”

Laurie Stevens, assistant to the Thompson Divide Coalition board of directors, said her grassroots group of environmentalists, ranchers, sportsmen and other residents is encouraged by the letter.

“This is a huge action taken on behalf of the Thompson Divide Coalition,” she said.

Members of the Thompson Divide Coalition, along with Newman and other leaders in Pitkin County, have also been bending the ears of Reps. Scott Tipton, R-Colo., and Diana DeGette, D-Colo. Tipton, whose environmental record has been blasted by conservation groups, is a key player in the discussion since he is the only one in the House who holds political jurisdiction over the affected area.

“There has been a real bipartisan effort to find a compromise,” Stevens said. “Rep. Tipton has been incredible to work with and willing to listen to all sides.”

It shouldn't take long for Salazar to get up to speed on the senators' letter. His brother, John, pledged to draft legislation to protect Thompson Divide but he lost his seat to Tipton before he ever did.

Follow Troy Hooper on Twitter


comments: 0 Comments on "Senators seek more time for Thompson Divide review"

Be the first to comment below.

COMMENT
Comment Form Info  Comment Information
Real Aspen encourages you to post comments on our articles and blogs. Logged in email is required for monitoring purposes. Your email will not be published and will not be distributed to any third-party. Abusive, obscene, profane, threatening, libelous or defamatory comments are prohibited. By posting a comment, you agree to this policy and our terms of use. To report an abusive posting, please contact us.

To make a comment, please log in or create an account. This helps us prevent spam and other malicious attacks.

Please log in to comment

 

Create a user account to comment

Real Aspen River Report

River Name / Location Stream flow, ft3/s Gage height ft
Gore Creek
At Upper Station, Near I-70 Twin Bridges n/a 5 ft
Booth Creek n/a 4 ft
Abv Red Sandstone Creek At Vail 254 7 ft
At Mouth Near Minturn 289 7 ft
Beaver Creek
At Avon 21 2 ft
Lake Creek
Near Edwards 114 1 ft
Cross Creek
Near Minturn 158 4 ft
Homestake Creek
At Gold Park 199 5 ft
Eagle River
East Fork Eagle River Near Climax n/a 2 ft
At Red Cliff 30 3 ft
Near Minturn 296 4 ft
Wastewater Treatment Plant At Avon 838 5 ft
Below Gypsum 844 5 ft
Colorado River
Near Kremmling 374 4 ft
Near Dotsero 1,410 3 ft
Below Glenwood Springs 3,140 5 ft
Near Cameo 3,260 6 ft
Below Grand Valley Div Nr Palisade 1,800 5 ft
Near Colorado-utah State Line 3,860 4 ft
Near Cisco, Ut 4,270 3 ft
At Lees Ferry, Az 9,740 9 ft
Near Grand Canyon, Az 8,190 6 ft
Yuma Main Canal Ww At Yuma, Az 1,040 10 ft
Roaring Fork River
Abv Lost Man Cr Near Aspen n/a n/a ft
Ab Difficult C Nr Aspen 64 1 ft
Near Aspen 119 2 ft
Near Emma 546 6 ft
At Glenwood Springs 1,230 4 ft
Hunter Creek
Near Aspen 57 2 ft
At Aspen 53 4 ft
Frying Pan River
Near Ruedi 110 1 ft
Crystal River
Abv Avalanche Crk, Near Redstone 773 3 ft
Arkansas River
Ef Arkansas R At Us Highway 24, Nr Leadville 60 3 ft
Near Leadville 95 5 ft
Below Empire Gulch Near Malta 159 4 ft
Below Granite 372 4 ft
Near Nathrop 410 4 ft
At Parkdale 444 3 ft
VIDEO GALLERY
Aspen plastic bag ban
The Oasis
Widespread Panic fans camp overnight in Aspen to get tickets to the Belly Up shows!